An Argument Against Using the Supreme Court Rules in UMP Arbitrations

An Argument Against Using the Supreme Court Rules in UMP Arbitrations

The purpose of this exercise is to impart to the reader (the parties and their counsel) the advantage of employing all of the benefits of the new Arbitration Act, SBC 2020 c 2 (the Act) and the Vancouver International Arbitration Centre’s (VanIAC) Rules (the Rules), recognizing the disadvantages of the Supreme Court Civil Rules, BC Reg 168/2009 (SCR) when prosecuting or defending an underinsured motorist protection program (UMP) case.

Read the full article here: An Argument Against Using the Supreme Court Rules in UMP Arbitrations, by Kenneth Glasner, QC, FCIArb.

Leave a Reply